Random Thoughts from a Computer Science Student…

If you want a good primer on what HES is all about, give this article a read:

Turning a Chipper 100

It’s a shame that HES doesn’t get more attention.  It serves a very important and worthy purpose in the maze of options and initiatives at Harvard.  Give the article a read and broaden your understanding of the HES mission.

I’ve had a chance to read both Harvard Extension Dean Michael Shinagel’s book The Gates Unbarred as well as Ian Lamont’s review of it.  I agree with a lot of what Ian has to say about the book, but on one point I disagree with Ian in some fundamental ways: the role of distance education at Harvard, particularly in degree programs.

I’ve made no secret of the fact that I took the majority of my coursework at Harvard Online.  Out of the 64 credits that I needed to graduate, I took fully 56 of those via the distance education option.  The other 8 hours I took on-campus, sitting in a classroom alongside the other HES students.

My own opinion is mixed on the subject but I have to disagree with Ian on one issue he seems to feel very strongly about: that taking a distance class is a fundamentally inferior experience than the in-class experience.

Ian’s own opinion seems pretty cut and dry:

The idea that email, prerecorded lectures, and asynchronous message board exchanges can completely replace being in a room with your professor and classmates is ridiculous, yet that’s exactly what the Extension School is promoting — particularly for the undergraduate ALB and graduate ALM in IT degrees, both of which can be earned with upwards of 90% distance education credit (i.e., as little as a single semester or two seven-week summer sessions on campus).

I’ll note that Harvard is hardly alone in this trend.  As I’ve noted before, other Ivy League schools offer entire engineering degrees that are indistinguishable from those offered on campus.  Columbia’s CVN program is one of them.  That program requires NO presence on campus and offers degrees in some pretty difficult disciplines.  Carnegie Mellon offers a Masters Degree in Software Engineering.  So it’s a given that different schools are experimenting with the appropriate role of distance education in the context of a degree program.  The opportunity is huge.  The ability to reach students worldwide is a significant incentive to get involved in this new learning paradigm.

But what of the actual experience?  What are you missing when you only have a limited sensory and interactive environment compared to a “live” classroom?

First, the one thing you give up is presence.  In the current modes of distance learning, the student is aware of the instructor, but the instructor isn’t aware of the student.

Second, you give up a certain degree of interactivity.  You can’t raise your hand and immediately query the instructor.  You also can’t be called upon by the instructor.

Finally, you give up a certain degree of cooperative education.  You can’t interact with your fellow students in as friction free a manner as you could when they are all right there with you in the classroom.

Those are all important aspects of education and it’s great if you can get them.

But what if you can’t?

Let’s look at some of the barriers to those same three aspects of classroom-driven “live” education.

Presence:

• Distance : you live in a different city (or a different country) from where the class is being taught.
• Scheduling : your particular life situation makes attending class at the required times an impossibility.
• Handicap : you have a particular impediment that makes actually being (or learning) in a classroom difficult or impossible.

Interactivity:

• Class size: some “live” classes are huge.  Getting the attention of the instructor is basically akin to being very very lucky.  You might
• Teaching Style: some Professors don’t like to answer questions in class or prefer to defer extended Q&A sessions to “office hours.”
• Time: with a limited amount of class time, the level of additional discourse on a particular topic can be greatly constrained.

Cooperative Education:

• Subject matter: some subjects don’t lend themselves well to cooperative education.  Programming is probably one of these.  Math probably isn’t either (distinct from a one-on-one tutoring environment).
• Competition: the other students might not be particularly motivated to help you learn (especially if they think you are their competition on the grading curve)
• Attention seekers: some students tend to dominate the class conversation without necessarily adding to the class discourse.

These are all ways in which a “live” class experience can fall short of the ideal when we consider the primary purpose of the course: the absorption and understanding of the subject matter being taught.  The subjective evidence seems to indicate that there is a very wide gap between the ideal classroom experience and the actual classroom experience.  (If you’ve ever had to sit through a lecture by a less-than-dynamic professor in a half-filled classroom in an environment that isn’t comfortable with a gaggle of uninterested (or uninteresting) students, you know what I mean.)

For all of the benefits of “live” classroom presentation, it has been my experience that a good lecturer is a rare find indeed.  Even rarer is a collection of students that is as engaged in the subject matter as a good professor.  Yet if a particular class falls short on both of those aspects, why aren’t we talking about how that comparatively poor experience is a hindrance to learning?

I would argue that replacing a poor “live” class with a good “distance” class would overcome a lot of the problems I just listed.  And that’s just the beginning.

Lets look at another problem of learning that is always at the forefront: access.  Most people equate access with cost, but in reality it’s a much more complex issue.  A single mother might be able to afford the cost of education, but not the cost of day-care for her family.  A father might be able to afford the cost of a class, but can’t take advantage of it because the class times conflict with his work schedule.

A heartless cynic might say that what needs to change is that person’s situation, rather than the mode of delivering the education.

But let’s look at another perspective: that of the handicapped person who is greatly limited in their ability to interact with others in a “live” classroom environment but nonetheless able to complete the coursework and pass the exams.

I would find it hard to believe that someone would consider their achievement a somewhat lesser experience because they weren’t able to participate fully in the same manner as more able-bodied students.  Is the degree of a paraplegic student a different achievement from their peers if they used assistave technology to complete their studies?

That’s why I’m less than convinced by arguments to roll back or slow the progress that distance education has made in bringing educational opportunity to the world.  If you read Shinagel’s book, it’s clear that there are a lot of hurdles that needed to be overcome to find a workable way forward.  A lot of innovative development was required to solve the problems of distance and participation.  I’m convinced that future developments will only narrow the distance between the in-class experience and the distance one. Several months ago, I was able to use a Cisco Telepresence system to interact with some colleagues in California.  To each other, it appeared as if we were siting across the desk from each other.  Given my experience with distance education, I could only imagine the possibilities  of using this technology for a college class.

In the future, it should be possible to meld the best elements of both to solve the problems we all face in getting the best education possible.  I’m convinced it can happen and the history of distance education at Harvard shows that the problems are solvable.  To do it, we’re going to have to reconsider what the important parts of a “Harvard” education really are and how we can preserve the best parts of that experience while looking forward to expanding the reach of that experience.

First, I’m going to apologize for taking so long to write this up.  Things have been crazy for a while in my life.  For one thing, it’s felt very good to be done with school.  I’ve been catching up on a lot of things that I didn’t have the time to enjoy while I was working towards my degree.

For one thing, I needed to do a lot of cleanup around my house.  I had tons of books and papers to file and it took me quite a bit of time to get everything straightened up.  If you’ve ever had to clean out a garage, that’s what my office was like.

For another thing, I picked up a new hobby: Crossfit.  I regret to say that whatever level of fitness I had before starting my studies, it was distinctly less once I finished.  True to form, I picked a program that is probably the most challenging type of fitness program you can find.

Anyhow, I promised you a recap of the rest of my graduation day.

Afternoon Exercises

One thing that most people aren’t prepared for is the sheer volume of people present at graduation.  Once the morning exercises are over, the task at hand is to find your guests and get over to wherever they are going to actually hand you your degree.  For the ALB candidates, that’s the Loeb Theatre.

Finding my family and guests was a challenge.  Before we separated for the morning exercises, I told them to meet me in front of the CVS right across the street from Johnston Gate.  That’s on the way to the Loeb Theatre and a convenient landmark.

It was a good thing I told them before the morning exercises too because my battery died from all of the pictures I took with my Blackberry to upload to Facebook.

Once we walked over to the theatre, things were a little more relaxed.  A nice selection of sandwiches and drinks were set up for people to enjoy while we set ourselves up for the ceremony.  I was absolutely famished.

Somewhere along the line, they hustled all of our guests into the theatre and we were the only ones left in the hall.  It can be a little strange to be surrounded by a mass of people in dark flowing robes.  The Loeb Theatre lobby isn’t the most spacious venue and I’ll admit to feeling a bit claustrophobic in those surroundings.  I’m sure being packed into Tercentenary Theatre for most of the morning didn’t help.

That’s when we were surprised by a nice gift from the school: a Harvard Extension shield lapel pin.  We lined up in our graduation order and pinned those onto our gowns as we waited to march into the auditorium.

Unless you’ve ever been on stage, it can be hard to imagine the feeling of being the object of attention in a ceremony like this.  As we were walking to our designated seats in a line and the music was playing, I couldn’t help feeling a curious mix of anxiety and pride.  I had made it.  I was finished.  Nothing was going to come between me and that degree.  Yet I feared that something unknowable and unforeseen was stalking me.  Perhaps it was the knowledge that I’d tried twice before to complete a degree, only to have some life obstacle block my way.  I can’t be sure.  What I can tell you is that I became acutely aware of my own fears all along the way from the very beginning that I wouldn’t finish.

I’m sure I wasn’t the only one to feel that way.  Lots of us had to modify or otherwise compromise our schedules to stay on track.  My plans had me graduating in 2008 but I had to delay that by one year to ensure I would meet my goal to graduate cum laude and with the coursework I wanted.

The Commencement Speaker

All of these thoughts were going through my mind when the person seated next to me started to nervously thumb what looked like a set of prepared remarks.  As it so happens, Ryan Slattery, our graduation speaker, was seated directly to my right.

When he was called upon to present those remarks, I felt a sense that maybe I should have made an attempt to convey to the audience and the other graduates what my own journey had meant to me and how the struggle to balance a professional life and an academic endeavor had altered my own perspective of what I could achieve.  I felt like I should have tried to at least offer my own words for consideration.  I felt a quick pang of regret.  All I could do was hope Ryan’s address would capture some of my feelings and that he would deliver it with a tone that would engage the audience.

As it turns out, Ryan was an actor on his way to graduate film school at UCLA, a very selective program.  He probably had more time in front of an audience than any other person in that room.  We couldn’t have been luckier in choosing a speaker.

And so Ryan delivered a graduation speech that was full of feeling and a sense of the sacrifice that drove all of us forward.  Here are some highlights from his speech:

Usually, Commencement speeches focus on these grand journeys ahead – and let there be no doubt this will be the case for everyone here – but I think it is appropriate to speak of the diverse and surely winding roads that have brought us all together today.

…

Our program is often called ” a second chance at a first-class education.”

…

Each and every degree conferred today has meaning beyond the print on the paper.  Each represents the journey of its recipient.  It is a symbol of missed anniversaries, baseball games, and dinners with the kids; of long flights and train rides; of rising the the challenge of a second chance; of fulfilling the pride of loved ones now gone.  There is simply not enough room on the degree to write about what it really means, but the stories of sacrifice of each and every degree recipient, most of which will probably go untold, make today more special than anyone can imagine.

As I listened to him speak, I was happy they chose him to give the speech.  His experience was similar to my own.  He felt the same sense that he should make the most of this opportunity and push as far as he could.  He understood that the way forward was often difficult and the right path through unclear.

In the end, after all of the awards were handed out and we began to line up to walk across the stage and receive the degree, I was struck by a curious coincidence.  When I first traveled to Cambridge, the first person I spoke to about the degree program was Mark Ouchida, one of the advisers.  Now, there just off-stage alongside me, was Mark.  We greeted each other with the sense that he was both the first person I met at Harvard and the last person I would speak to before I finally graduated.  Right then, I knew everything would be fine.

As my name was called, I walked past my own advisor, Suzanne Spreadbury, who had called me forth.  I made my way across the stage to the Dean, Michael Shinagel, who handed me the red envelope containing that precious piece of paper.  His only words to me:

Big Smile!

And with that, we turned toward the camera, paused for a photo, and I joined the ranks of Harvard Alumni.

It’s been a little while since I’ve posted here but I’m hoping that you’ll forgive me.

After four years, countless trips back and forth to Cambridge, endless nights spent staying up late to finish assignments, and a general lack of downtime, I can say that I’m happy to report I received my bachelor’s degree on Jun 4th at the Harvard 2009 Commencement.

So I took a nice long vacation to celebrate.

Although there is so much to tell you all, I’m going to be brief and include just a few photos from the event.

Morning Exercises

I arrived at 51 Brattle Street right on time at 7am.  This was a bit of a challenge since I was traveling with family.  One thing that’s isn’t quite apparent is that the actual morning exercises don’t really start until 10am.  Those three hours are needed to get everyone into their seats and in the right positions.  If your family is coming with you, remind them of that.  People were lining up to get seats in Tercentenary Theatre early that morning.  Once you get into the yard, it’s going to be a long wait for everything to get started.

We had to walk from 51 Brattle Street to a staging location right behind Sever Hall.  They counted us out at 51 Brattle Street and made sure that we were all “present and accounted for” and then had us hang out in the courtyard behind the building while we enjoyed some refreshments.

One nice thing was meeting up with a couple of former classmates of mine from EXPOs E-25.  Out of the 16 or so classmates that I had from that class, only those two were there to graduate.  I can only assume that some of my classmates didn’t complete the ALB program or were still working on the degree.  I can’t imagine anyone getting it done faster.  It felt like I was burning the candle at both ends for the past four years.

Once we received the go-ahead, we made the walk to Sever Hall.   This was pretty fun, since we got to mingle and see all of the graduating members from the other schools.  It’s amazing how many people graduate from Harvard every year and there was a wide variety of academic regalia on display.  Members from the Harvard Business School, the Graduate School of Education, the Divinity School, and the Graduate School of Design were just some of the groups I saw as we moved to Sever Hall.

It seemed like we were lined up behind Sever for an eternity.  Of course, this is just a by product of the massive operation involved in making sure that everyone is in place for the final walk into the ceremony.  A comparison between the arrangement of military forces preparing an invasion and the process of getting everyone in place for Commencement wouldn’t be too far off the mark.  Before we actually got to take our seats, the view was one of a black-robed army.

Finally, we arranged ourselves in a column two-abreast and walked into the Theatre.  Almost from the beginning, we were walking past everyone’s families snapping photos and saying congratulations.  There were a LOT of folks there!  It really was a fun time!

Reaching our seats was a little comical.  The seats are so close together that anyone with any sense of personal space is bound to feel a bit squeezed.  Adding yards of flowing fabric to our predicament didn’t exactly help matters either.  Getting up or sitting down involved much gathering of gown and profuse apologies for sitting down on someone else’s robe.  We all took it in good humor.

Then, once we were all in our seats, the fun began…

….stay tuned for Part II!

I’m supporting Andre Bisasor for HESA President.  I’d like to explain my reasoning and some exasperation at some of the other candidate statements.

In my humble opinion, HES students are supposed to be selecting someone for their executive experience. By that, I mean that the job primarily requires those who have the skills to set goals and achieve them. Sometimes that means doing the work yourself. At other times, it means motivating others to do the work.

It isn’t about dreaming up ideas. Lots of people can do that. It isn’t hard to come up with ideas.
It isn’t about having some sort of background. Lots of people come from disadvantaged backgrounds.

One thing I think has been steadfastly lacking in past HESA administrations is the level of professionalism and attention to detail. I think we really had something with Carlos. More than any other administration, he reached out to students and committed himself to opening up HESA to a wider audience.

He sent out regular emails about the workings of the administration.
He posted here very frequently.
He took steps to make the results of the meetings a matter of the public record. The HESA website contained links to minutes of (almost) every meeting.

These were good things. A lot of it was dry reading but it as important because people who weren’t on campus or couldn’t make meetings could at least follow along as things happened. We don’t have a group that endeavors to cover our political meetings or write articles in the Crimson about new developments so it’s at least mildly novel that he took steps to do these things without any outside pressure.

But that all stopped when Carlos left. Whatever transparency we had was lost. The HESA website fell into disuse and the postings trailed off.

I believe that a lack of executive experience is the reason that this happened. Without any background in “making things happen” we got a lot of half-hearted efforts from the current administration. Some events were poorly attended because invitations came too late. Other opportunities to increase the profile and influence of HES were missed.

But working quietly in the background was Andre Bisasor. He put together the HESLS and re-launched an entire conference. He turned an entirely defunct organization around. That’s a remarkable feat.

He wasn’t paid for his efforts. He wasn’t directed to do this by the current HESA administration. He saw an opportunity to get something done and then went out and did it.

He didn’t ask to be recognized for a job he hadn’t already completed. That speaks volumes about his character.

I’m afraid that the other candidates are simply missing the point. They either believe that they are owed the position or are trying to imply that their on-the-job accomplishments make them a natural fit for president.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

It’s far too easy to become discouraged as HESA president. It’s an all volunteer ogranization and sometimes, people don’t feel like it’s important for them to work at it. Grandiose plans are great, but if there isn’t someone there to actually translate those ideas into actions, nothing happens. It actually hurts us to have too-ambitious goals.

That’s why I’m so critical of the other candidates and supportive of Andre Bisasor. I’m tired of candidate statements that reflect not a single iota of activity at Harvard. Nothing. Not forming a club. Not attending the HESA meetings. Not even showing up to the debates.

I think that Andre is different. He worked with Carlos and has seen at least one effective administration up close. If he can use that example, we can see great things from HESA in the coming years by building on what has already been accomplished.

We don’t need economic development activities. We don’t need more parties. We need simple, effective leadership that concentrates our efforts on measurable and meaningful activities that benefit the school as a whole as well as individual students. Events like the Negotiation and Leadership conference are exactly the sort of thing I’m talking about.

In my four years at HES, no other event has made me feel more connected to the school and to the university. I got a chance to meet members of many different schools at Harvard. It was a great networking opportunity and a chance to meet other HES students.

If we can get even one more of those events under our belt as an organization under the HESA banner, we will be doing splendidly.

I spent this past Saturday at the Harvard Negotiation and Leadership Conference.

If you weren’t one of the over 300 people at the conference, you missed out.

I’m going to post a more detailed review in the next few days, but I was very impressed by the quality of the conference and the discussions among the speakers.

Andre convinced some very notable names to attend the conference and give presentations and it’s clear that the audience enjoyed the opportunity to ask them questions.

What’s even more impressive is that this conference represented the first inter-school arranged conference. Both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School cooperated with Andre Bisasor at the Harvard Extension School to make this conference a reality.

My opinion is that this event symbolizes how HES participates as a full member of the Harvard academic community. I think we need many more such examples.

When I started this blog, my stated purpose for completing my undergraduate degree was to get a credential that I needed to attend graduate school. Now that I’m essentially done with the ALB program (I walk at June commencement) I’m finding that it’s a little more difficult to choose a program than I initially thought.

One of the problems that I face, and I’m sure that others face is one of resources: time and money. Another concern is the desire for flexibility in how the actual classes are delivered. There are a lot of distance/part-time options out there but they vary in quality very widely.

Initially, I was thinking about Columbia’s CVN program for a Master’s degree in Computer Science. The problem with this is the fact that EACH class costs a little over $4000. The classes are delivered on-line and there is no residency requirement.

Another option is the Part-time MBA from UMass-Amherst. It’s also delivered completely online and a relative bargain. The whole program of 37 credits will only cost a about 26K. That’s a big savings over the cost of about $45K for the MS at Columbia.

Then there is a third option: the ALM-M program at HES. It requires 12 classes, but each class is only about $2K. Not only is that a little less expensive than the pMBA program, but it’s a tad more attractive since it appears there is some evidence that they will be increasing the admissions requirements. This can only benefit the program. It’s a unique idea, since the Harvard Business School already offers a (very prestigious) MBA at a very expensive 46K per year (and you require two years). It appears that it is a bit MBA-like, with some other coursework thrown in to make the program a bit more tailored for someone who isn’t necessarily on track to be a CEO but wants to add to their management/leadership skill-set.

I’m still trying to decide and it isn’t fun. Whatever choice I make, I’m going to incur some opportunity cost.

I need to think long and hard about this.

I’m done with all of my coursework.

It’s been a long time since I posted and that’s mainly because I’ve been focused on taking care of all the other things that I neglected while I was working on school.

One of the things I have been focusing is what to do next.

As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, I’m looking at what kind of graduate program I might like to pursue. So far, I’ve only discussed the CVN program at Columbia University. There are others.

One I’ve been looking into is the MBA program at University of Massachusetts-Amherst. The entire program can be taken online and is AACSB accredited. I’m intrigued.

More to come…

I had a job at Circuit City about 15 years ago.

When I started there, I had just moved to Gainesville, FL.  My plan was to try and get into the University of Florida (I did) and to do that, I needed to make some money.  I signed up for a temporary holiday position and started working.

It was a fun job.  I sold computers and TVs and made a better than average wage for the time.  The job had flexible hours and I liked the people I worked with.  After the holiday season, they asked me to stay on and I took a part-time job there.

But somewhere along the line, things changed.

For one thing, management started scheduling me for 35 hours per week while still classifying me as part-time.  According to their own rules, I was supposed to be classified as full-time if I was regularly scheduled for more than 30 hours a week.  Being part-time meant I didn’t get any benefits.

Then they started cutting our commissions.  As a salesperson, we were paid a gross commission on the total dollar amount we sold as well as specific dollar amount (SPFs) on certain items.  The gross commission went from 1% to 0.5% and the SPFs were cut as well.

Then they started making it possible for customers to purchase items without involving a salesperson.  So we lost a bunch of sales.

The last straw came when they forced everyone to agree to a binding arbitration agreement for essentially everything that they might get sued for.  Think things like endangering worker health, racial discrimination,  or sexual harassment.

That’s when I left.

That’s why this latest bit of news didn’t surprise me.  It’s a sad tale but reflects a pattern of management behavior that made a sequence of decisions leading to their probable demise.  They treated their workforce as a cost rather than an asset and did everything they could to drive the good employees away and hire cheap ones.

It also reminded me that I had to leave school because my work was conflicting with my coursework.  I earned bad grades because I let Circuit City push me around.  They were interested in maximizing my availability and a degree program got in the way of that.  They simply didn’t care.  I was complicit in this because I stayed longer than I should have and I let my grades suffer to keep management happy.

I never made that mistake again.

When I started at Harvard Extension, my previous employer initially was supportive.  When it became clear that I needed more flexibility to complete my studies than they were used to giving, they tried to push me to give up my coursework.

This time I made the right choice and found another job.  As it happens, that employer had a tuition reimbursement program that gave me $4000 per year to apply to a degree program.  Not a lot, but every little bit helps.  They subsequently doubled that to $8000.

I’m lucky to be employed by a company that values their employees.  They have made an investment in me and my education and I’m grateful for that.  If you’ve ever been in my situation, you know how it feels for an employer to see you as a valued asset rather than a problem to be dealt with.  Companies that pay their employees well and treat them with respect tend to be more profitable as well.

A while back Circuit City made headlines when it laid off its most senior employees but offered to hire them back at reduced compensation level.  In essence, they were trying to get someone who had become good enough at their job to warrant a series of pay increases for a greatly reduced price.  Most of them (rightfully) declined.  Circuit City’s profits plunged in subsequent quarters as the less experienced and less productive employees couldn’t make up the shortfall in sales volume.

I know that a lot of people who read this blog are working professionals.  Quite a few are juggling work and family along with their studies.  It might seem obvious but if you are serious about doing well in school, you need to make sure your employer will value you and support your quest to earn a degree.

I’ve had the experience of working for one who didn’t and the one thing I learned is that it isn’t worth the hassle.  Changing jobs is never easy but it can be worthwhile if the cost of not doing so is a poor showing in your degree program.

UPDATE: Looks like it’s the beginning of the end.  Just don’t believe the line about “economic conditions” being the reason for this.  The nails were put into the coffin by management making a host of bad decisions about marketing and strategy, especially when it comes to their most valuable asset: their employees.

Long time, no post.  That’s because I’ve been up to my eyeballs in Problem Sets.

Computer Science programs at traditional universities tend to be pretty rich in theory classes.  CS is very much like a math degree and many CS departments are linked to the math departments which can surprise some people.  That’s a big difference from your typical IT degree offered at a garden-variety non-traditional school.  When I was looking for programs that would allow me to complete my degree on-line, the focus for most of those schools was on learning some programming language or development tool or framework.  The theory of computation isn’t nearly as concrete a skill-set as C# programming.

Of course, this is a good thing from my perspective.  I was specifically looking for a program that was heavy on theory but allowed for some mix-in of practical skills that would be useful to someone who needed a specific skill.  I’m happy to say that Harvard Extension provides this environment.

That’s why I signed up for CSCI E-207, Formal Systems and Computation.  It’s actually a taped version of CS-121, a course taught at Harvard College.  Harvard Extension typically offers about 20 to 30 of these classes every year, which give non-traditional students to opportunity to learn from regular Harvard faculty.

if you ever had any questions about the differences between the material at HES and the College, take a close look at these two problem sets.

CSCI E-207 Problem Set 3

CS-121 Problem Set 3

Petty similar, eh?  The one major difference is that the points awarded are different.  I’m not sure what the rationale for this is.  It’s possible that the College students are being graded on some different scale than the Extension students.  What’s important to realize is that the material we are expected to absorb and the work we’re expected to do is pretty close to what they expect of the Harvard kids.  If you ever entertained the thought that HES isn’t really Harvard, then you might change your opinion if you had to actually take one of these classes.

I’m excited and a little anxious about performing well in this class.  This course is about as close to being about pure computation as you can get.  Understanding the fundamental principles they are covering is an important part of any real computer science degree.  It’s right up there with understanding data structures and algorithms.

I’m also taking CSCI E-168 this semester, Ruby on Rails.  It’s pretty much a boot-camp style course on Ruby and Web Development using Rails.  One suggestion: if you are planning on taking a heavy course like E-207, mix it with another class that’s not as intense a time demand or take it alone.

You have been warned.